Personal tools
You are here: Home Book Reviews Review of Our One Great Act of Fidelity by Ronald Rolheiser
Categories
Archive  February 17, 2010
Blogs  August 21, 2007
Book Reviews  August 21, 2007
Categories  August 17, 2007
Columnists  January 23, 2008
Editorials  August 21, 2007
ELCA Sexuality Statement  August 21, 2007
Extras  August 21, 2007
Hymns  August 15, 2007
Sermons  August 21, 2007
Prayers

Prayers for all 3 years of the lectionary cycle.

Year A  October 18, 2011
Year B  October 18, 2011
Year C  October 18, 2011
 
Document Actions

Review of Our One Great Act of Fidelity by Ronald Rolheiser

by Dan Biles — July 16, 2011

I first encountered the writing of Fr. Ron Rolheiser, OMI, quite by accident. In 2008 I was visiting my cousin in England; we spent a day in Liverpool where her daughter was at university. After a visit to the Roman Catholic cathedral church there—surely a classic example of uninspiring modern church architecture—we browsed the bookstore. I spied a copy of Rolheiser’s best-selling book, The Holy Longing, bought it, and spent the plane ride home absorbed in reading it...

Ronald Rolheiser, Our One Great Act of Fidelity: Waiting for Christ in the Eucharist (New York: Image, 2011).

I first encountered the writing of Fr. Ron Rolheiser, OMI, quite by accident. In 2008 I was visiting my cousin in England; we spent a day in Liverpool where her daughter was at university. After a visit to the Roman Catholic cathedral church there—surely a classic example of uninspiring modern church architecture—we browsed the bookstore. I spied a copy of Rolheiser’s best-selling book, The Holy Longing, bought it, and spent the plane ride home absorbed in reading it.

That encounter has blossomed into an avid continual reading of Rolheiser’s works. Rolheiser, a Canadian by birth, is a Roman Catholic priest and member of the Missionary Oblates of Mary Immaculate. He is president of the Oblate School of Theology in San Antonio, Texas. His books are popular throughout the English-speaking world and his weekly column is carried by more than seventy newspapers worldwide.

What has impressed me in his writings is a “gracious orthodoxy.” Rolheiser is a priest of firm Roman Catholic commitments, without the “circle-the-wagons” attitude one often finds among proponents of orthodoxy. For him, orthodox doctrine is not a dividing wall we erect to separate ourselves from those who are different from us; it is the means to begin dialogue with others, liberal and conservative, traditionalists or revisionists, Christian or not.

Rolheiser’s latest book is Our One Great Act of Fidelity: Waiting for Christ in the Eucharist, a delightful, thoughtful series of meditations on the Eucharist: its nature and centrality in the life of faith and the Church. This is not a book about the history of the Eucharist or the various theological disputes about it that have occurred in the history of the Church. Rather, it is a series of personal reflections on the Eucharist, easily understandable to lay and clergy alike, from a person for whom daily reception of the Eucharist is the anchor of his faith.

Rolheiser calls the Eucharist our “one great act of fidelity,” because, in spite of all the other ways Christians through the ages have failed to be faithful to Jesus, in one thing they have: they have continually followed Jesus’ instructions to “Do This....” in remembrance of Him. Rolheiser writes of himself:

The older I get, the more I see, too, how blind I am to my own hypocrisies and how weak and rationalizing is my human nature. I don’t always know when I am rationalizing or biased or following Christ properly. And even when I do, I don’t always have the strength or will to do what I know is right. And so, I lean heavily on the invitation Jesus left us on the night before He died: to break bread and drink wine in His memory and to trust that this, if all else is uncertain, is what I should be doing while I wait for Him to return. ... We can be faithful in this one deep way: we can go to the Eucharist regularly. (pp. 121-122)

The book consists of five distinct parts. Part I is three meditations on the Eucharist and the Incarnation, which lays the foundation for everything else. Part II is twelve mediations on the many dimensions of the Eucharist. For example: “The Eucharist as God’s Physical Embrace,” “The Eucharist as Invitation to Justice,” “The Eucharist as the Ultimate Invitation to Mature Discipleship,” “The Eucharist as Sacrifice.” Part Three is a wonderful treatment of the spirituality of the Eucharist, rooted in the four-fold action of Jesus in instituting the Lord’s Supper (taking, giving thanks, breaking, sharing). In Part Four Rolheiser explains how the Church’s observance of the Eucharist has been its one constant act of faithfulness. He concludes his book with three sermons on the Eucharist by St. Augustine, whose theology figures strongly and often in Rolheiser’s writings.

This book is excellent as a meditative reading for lay and clergy alike, as a book for a study group, or the basis for a Lenten sermon series.

Dan Biles is the Pastor at St. Paul Lutheran Church in Spring Grove, Pennsylvania.


Not so faithful act?

Posted by Peter at July 16, 2011 16:05
I'm concerned that Fr Rolheiser can call Holy Communion our one great act of fidelity, because that statement is demonstrably false. Even aside from issues like 'Communion is a gift God gives us, not an act of obedience', we HAVEN'T been faithful to Communion. The easiest example is: which is the faithful way to practice Communion: open vs closed? If you think both can be acceptable, I doubt you can justify personally practicing closed Communion. That throws at least three denominations: Catholic, LCMS and ELCA into stark contrast. There's also those denominations that don't do Communion. If we did delve into history, there are plenty of examples where Communion has been used as a weapon-- either by excommunicating people, or even physically forcing people to accept the Sacrament to "prove" connection between two churches. There have been modern examples of Communing pets. We haven't been faithful in our practices of Communion.

Based on the above review, I fear that this book obscures justification by faith in twisting Communion from a free gift of forgiveness God gives to undeserving sinners into an act we perform to earn God's grace. Fr Rolheiser is Catholic, so it's not surprising theological development, but still one that undermines our understanding of the Sacraments.

Fr. Rolheiser

Posted by Jim Wagner at July 17, 2011 00:03
Peter,
Have you actually read Fr. Rolheiser? If not I suggest you do.

Reply to "Peter"

Posted by Pr. Dan Biles at July 18, 2011 03:09
No where ever in his book does Rolheiser suggest that our faithfulness in observing Jesus' command to do the Eucharist earns us salvation. "Peter's" comment is a typical knee-jerk Lutheran response that exemplifies the "circle-the-wagons orthodoxy" that I mention in my review. It is possible to speak of faithfulness to God's commands without suggesting such acts are works-righteousness or pelagianism -- as indeed AC VI confesses that we believe and teach.

language

Posted by Peter at July 22, 2011 20:23
"Pr. Biles",

The language you cite and use in the review is why I am concerned starting with the title of the book. One problem today is that we all know what the correct code-words to use and avoid are, but we either redefine or misuse the code-words. Speaking of faithfulness especially, it's all too easy to fall into works-righteousness. Consider how often St Paul's attempts to do so (like 1 Corinthians 6:9-10 and similar verses in other letters) are used to turn Gospel to Law-- our message goes from 'your sins are forgiven through no merit of your own' to 'here's a list of sins to avoid.'

acts of fidelity

Posted by Dr. Bruce at August 21, 2011 15:50
Indeed, the New Testament is clear that we are saved by faith/belief in Jesus Christ and not by acts of obedience to the Law.

In the case of Rolheiser's book title, I actually very much like "act of fidelity" language over the more traditional "sacrament" language. Perhaps they mean the same, but the latter has taken on a rather mystical, even superstitious tone. Baptism/Confirmation, Eucharist, giving a thirsty person a drink of water are all "acts of fidelity" that do not get us into heaven but which are among the good deeds prepared by God for us to do. We are not supposed to be spiritual couch potatoes and lounge in our "salvation by faith" presumption that we really have that faith if we are not living it out. Jesus said that we would "know the tree by its fruit." What do you think that "fruit" IS?

Thanks for the review

Posted by Tim Seitz-Brown at July 24, 2011 20:02
Thanks for the review, Dan. Sounds like a good read.

Now in Print

Spring 2013


Spring 2013 Cover

In this issue:

What If the Shroud of Turin
Is Genuine?

Jesus Christ, Horror-Defeater

Universal Ordination
and Local Ministry

Things We Never
Preach About, Part 3:
Sexual Abuse

Thou Shalt Not Cheat
Prospective Lutherans!

The Samaritan Woman
as a Villain or a Victim

...and much, much more!

Subscribe online!

Submissions
We always welcome thoughtful articles, letters to the editor, hymns, and artwork.

Submission guidelines

Advertising
 

Powered by Plone CMS, the Open Source Content Management System

This site conforms to the following standards: